Hi Gabriele, Thanks for the context about your use case! > I don't expect to be needing to iterate over all running tasks, so as long as the new helper can be used against specific processes that can be identified via pid (and namespace) then I'm totally fine with your patch series. Sounds great! I'll proceed with my patch series based on `access_process_vm`. > I switched to access_process_vm (but kept my signature) and got something that works as intended for my use. Awesome! Thanks, Kenny
