Re: [PATCH v21 bpf-next 06/23] net: marvell: rely on xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 12:53:09PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Rely on xdp_update_skb_shared_info routine in order to avoid
> > resetting frags array in skb_shared_info structure building
> > the skb in mvneta_swbm_build_skb(). Frags array is expected to
> > be initialized by the receiving driver building the xdp_buff
> > and here we just need to update memory metadata.
> >
> > Acked-by: Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > index 775ffd91b741..267a306d9c75 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > @@ -2332,8 +2332,12 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> >               skb_frag_size_set(frag, data_len);
> >               __skb_frag_set_page(frag, page);
> >
> > -             if (!xdp_buff_is_mb(xdp))
> > +             if (!xdp_buff_is_mb(xdp)) {
> > +                     sinfo->xdp_frags_size = *size;
> >                       xdp_buff_set_mb(xdp);
> > +             }
> > +             if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
> > +                     xdp_buff_set_frag_pfmemalloc(xdp);
> >       } else {
> >               page_pool_put_full_page(rxq->page_pool, page, true);
> >       }
> > @@ -2347,7 +2351,6 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct page_pool *pool,
> >       struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
> >       struct sk_buff *skb;
> >       u8 num_frags;
> > -     int i;
> >
> >       if (unlikely(xdp_buff_is_mb(xdp)))
> >               num_frags = sinfo->nr_frags;
> > @@ -2362,18 +2365,12 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct page_pool *pool,
> >       skb_put(skb, xdp->data_end - xdp->data);
> >       skb->ip_summed = mvneta_rx_csum(pp, desc_status);
> >
> > -     if (likely(!xdp_buff_is_mb(xdp)))
> > -             goto out;
> > -
> > -     for (i = 0; i < num_frags; i++) {
> > -             skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[i];
> > -
> > -             skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags,
> > -                             skb_frag_page(frag), skb_frag_off(frag),
> > -                             skb_frag_size(frag), PAGE_SIZE);
>
> Maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure you have a suitable
> replacement for the 3 lines above this in your proposed change.
>

Hi Andy,

mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment() initializes frags array in
skb_shared_info for xdp whenever we receive a multi-descriptors frame.
Since frags array is at the same offset for the xdp_buff and for the
new skb and build_skb() in mvneta_swbm_build_skb() does not overwrite
it, we do not need to initialize it again allocating the skb, just
account metadata info running xdp_update_skb_shared_info(). Agree?

> > -     }
> > +     if (unlikely(xdp_buff_is_mb(xdp)))
> > +             xdp_update_skb_shared_info(skb, num_frags,
> > +                                        sinfo->xdp_frags_size,
> > +                                        num_frags * xdp->frame_sz,
> > +                                        xdp_buff_is_frag_pfmemalloc(xdp));
> >
>
> When I did an implementation of this on a different driver I also needed
> to add:
>
>         for (i = 0; i < num_frags; i++)
>                 skb_frag_set_page(skb, i, skb_frag_page(&sinfo->frags[i]));
>
> to make sure that frames that were given XDP_PASS were formatted
> correctly so they could be handled by the stack.  Don't you need
> something similar to make sure frags are properly set?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -andy
>
> P.S.  Sorry for noticing this so late in the process; I realize this version
> was just a rebase of v20 and this would have been useful information
> earlier if I'm correct.
>

no worries :)

Regards,
Lorenzo

> > -out:
> >       return skb;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.33.1
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux