Hi Daniel,
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Hi Naveen,
On 1/6/22 12:45 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
A set of fixes and updates to powerpc BPF JIT:
- Patches 1-3 fix issues with the existing powerpc JIT and are tagged
for -stable.
- Patch 4 fixes a build issue with bpf selftests on powerpc.
- Patches 5-9 handle some corner cases and make some small improvements.
- Patches 10-13 optimize how function calls are handled in ppc64.
Patches 7 and 8 were previously posted, and while patch 7 has no
changes, patch 8 has been reworked to handle BPF_EXIT differently.
Is the plan to route these via ppc trees? Fwiw, patch 1 and 4 look generic
and in general good to me, we could also take these two via bpf-next tree
given outside of arch/powerpc/? Whichever works best.
Yes, I would like to route this through the powerpc tree. Though patches
1 and 4 are generic, they primarily affect powerpc and I do not see
conflicting changes in bpf-next. Request you to please ack those patches
so that Michael can take it through the powerpc tree.
Thanks!
- Naveen
