On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 07:21:26PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:21:55 PST (-0800), mark.rutland@xxxxxxx wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 07:42:49PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:26:05 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > Hi Mark, Thomas, > > > > > > x86 and arm64 version of sort_relative_table routine are the same, I want to > > > unify them, and then use the common function for riscv, but I'm not sure > > > which name is better. Could you please suggest? > > > > I sent a patch last week which unifies them as > > sort_relative_table_with_data(): > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211108114220.32796-1-mark.rutland@xxxxxxx/ > > > > Thomas, are you happy with that patch? > > > > With your ack it could go via the riscv tree for v5.17 as a preparatory > > cleanup in this series. > > > > Maybe we could get it in as a cleanup for v5.16-rc{2,3} ? > > I don't see anything on that thread, and looks like last time I had to touch > sorttable I just took it via the RISC-V tree. I went ahead and put Mark's > patch, along with this patch set, on my for-next. FWIW, that sounds good to me. Thanks for picking that up! > I had to fix up a few minor issues, so LMK if anything went off the rails. I assume that was just for this patch set, as I couldn't spot any change to my patch in the riscv for-next branch. Thanks, Mark.
