Re: [PATCH v20 bpf-next 00/23] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 6:45 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
<lorenzo.bianconi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > Eelco Chaudron (3):
> >   bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
> >   bpf: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers
> >   bpf: selftests: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include
> >     multi-buffer
> >
> > Lorenzo Bianconi (19):
> >   net: skbuff: add size metadata to skb_shared_info for xdp
> >   xdp: introduce flags field in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
> >   net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
> >   net: mvneta: simplify mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment management
> >   net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine
> >   net: marvell: rely on xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine
> >   xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
> >   net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
> >   bpf: introduce BPF_F_XDP_MB flag in prog_flags loading the ebpf
> >     program
> >   net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames if the loaded XDP program support mb
> >   bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper
> >   bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init
> >   bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()
> >   bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish
> >     signature
> >   libbpf: Add SEC name for xdp_mb programs
> >   net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine
> >   bpf: selftests: introduce bpf_xdp_{load,store}_bytes selftest
> >   bpf: selftests: add CPUMAP/DEVMAP selftests for xdp multi-buff
> >   xdp: disable XDP_REDIRECT for xdp multi-buff
> >
> > Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen (1):
> >   bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility check
>
> Hi Alexei and Daniel,
>
> I noticed this series's state is now set to "New, archived" in patchwork.
> Is it due to conflicts? Do I need to repost?

I believe Daniel had some comments, but please repost anyway.
The fresh rebase will be easier to review.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux