Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: Initialise xskb free_list_node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:04:10 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > My $0.02 would be that if all relevant commits form a chain of fixes
> > it doesn't matter much which one you put in the tag. To me your
> > suggestion of going with 199d983bc015 makes most sense since from a
> > cursory look the direct issue doesn't really exist without that commit.
> >
> > Plus we probably don't want 199d983bc015 to be backported until we
> > apply this fix, so it'd be good if "Fixes: 199d983bc015" appeared in
> > linux-next.
> >
> > You can always put multiple Fixes tags on the commit, if you're unsure.  
> 
> It sounds that the fix should get into net and linus tree asap?
> In such a case mabe take it into net directly?

Ack



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux