Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Update sockopt_sk test to the use bpf_set_retval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:04 PM YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The tests would break without this patch, because at one point it calls

Please fix selftests in the same patch where kernel change breaks it
to ensure a proper "bisectability" of the code.

>   getsockopt(fd, SOL_TCP, TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE, &buf, &optlen)
> This getsockopt receives the kernel-set -EINVAL. Prior to this patch
> series, the eBPF getsockopt hook's -EPERM would override kernel's
> -EINVAL, however, after this patch series, return 0's automatic
> -EPERM will not; the eBPF prog has to explicitly bpf_set_retval(-EPERM)
> if that is wanted.
>
> I also removed the explicit mentions of EPERM in the comments in the
> prog.
>
> Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c     |  2 +-
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockopt_sk.c  | 32 +++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c
> index 4b937e5dbaca..164aa5020bf1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int getsetsockopt(void)
>         optlen = sizeof(buf.zc);
>         errno = 0;
>         err = getsockopt(fd, SOL_TCP, TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE, &buf, &optlen);
> -       if (errno != EPERM) {
> +       if (errno != EINVAL) {
>                 log_err("Unexpected getsockopt(TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE) err=%d errno=%d",
>                         err, errno);
>                 goto err;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockopt_sk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockopt_sk.c
> index 79c8139b63b8..d0298dccedcd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockopt_sk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sockopt_sk.c
> @@ -73,17 +73,17 @@ int _getsockopt(struct bpf_sockopt *ctx)
>                  */
>
>                 if (optval + sizeof(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive) > optval_end)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +                       return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>                 if (((struct tcp_zerocopy_receive *)optval)->address != 0)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, unexpected data */
> +                       return 0; /* unexpected data */
>
>                 return 1;
>         }
>
>         if (ctx->level == SOL_IP && ctx->optname == IP_FREEBIND) {
>                 if (optval + 1 > optval_end)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +                       return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>                 ctx->retval = 0; /* Reset system call return value to zero */
>
> @@ -96,24 +96,24 @@ int _getsockopt(struct bpf_sockopt *ctx)
>                  * bytes of data.
>                  */
>                 if (optval_end - optval != page_size)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, unexpected data size */
> +                       return 0; /* unexpected data size */
>
>                 return 1;
>         }
>
>         if (ctx->level != SOL_CUSTOM)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, deny everything except custom level */
> +               return 0; /* deny everything except custom level */
>
>         if (optval + 1 > optval_end)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +               return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>         storage = bpf_sk_storage_get(&socket_storage_map, ctx->sk, 0,
>                                      BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
>         if (!storage)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, couldn't get sk storage */
> +               return 0; /* couldn't get sk storage */
>
>         if (!ctx->retval)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, kernel should not have handled
> +               return 0; /* kernel should not have handled
>                            * SOL_CUSTOM, something is wrong!
>                            */
>         ctx->retval = 0; /* Reset system call return value to zero */
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ int _setsockopt(struct bpf_sockopt *ctx)
>                 /* Overwrite SO_SNDBUF value */
>
>                 if (optval + sizeof(__u32) > optval_end)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +                       return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>                 *(__u32 *)optval = 0x55AA;
>                 ctx->optlen = 4;
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ int _setsockopt(struct bpf_sockopt *ctx)
>                 /* Always use cubic */
>
>                 if (optval + 5 > optval_end)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +                       return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>                 memcpy(optval, "cubic", 5);
>                 ctx->optlen = 5;
> @@ -175,10 +175,10 @@ int _setsockopt(struct bpf_sockopt *ctx)
>         if (ctx->level == SOL_IP && ctx->optname == IP_FREEBIND) {
>                 /* Original optlen is larger than PAGE_SIZE. */
>                 if (ctx->optlen != page_size * 2)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, unexpected data size */
> +                       return 0; /* unexpected data size */
>
>                 if (optval + 1 > optval_end)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +                       return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>                 /* Make sure we can trim the buffer. */
>                 optval[0] = 0;
> @@ -189,21 +189,21 @@ int _setsockopt(struct bpf_sockopt *ctx)
>                  * bytes of data.
>                  */
>                 if (optval_end - optval != page_size)
> -                       return 0; /* EPERM, unexpected data size */
> +                       return 0; /* unexpected data size */
>
>                 return 1;
>         }
>
>         if (ctx->level != SOL_CUSTOM)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, deny everything except custom level */
> +               return 0; /* deny everything except custom level */
>
>         if (optval + 1 > optval_end)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, bounds check */
> +               return 0; /* bounds check */
>
>         storage = bpf_sk_storage_get(&socket_storage_map, ctx->sk, 0,
>                                      BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
>         if (!storage)
> -               return 0; /* EPERM, couldn't get sk storage */
> +               return 0; /* couldn't get sk storage */
>
>         storage->val = optval[0];
>         ctx->optlen = -1; /* BPF has consumed this option, don't call kernel
> --
> 2.34.1.173.g76aa8bc2d0-goog
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux