Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: add a selftest with __user tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/19/21 5:51 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:35:59AM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
Added a selftest with two __user usages: a __user pointer-type argument
and a __user pointer-type struct member. In both cases,
directly accessing the user memory will result verification failure.
...
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_type_tag_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_type_tag_user.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e149854f42dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_type_tag_user.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 {
+	int a;
+};
+
+struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 {
+	struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *p;
+};
+
+int g;
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
+{
+	g = arg->a;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2")
+int BPF_PROG(test_user2, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg)
+{
+	g = arg->p->a;
+	return 0;
+}

This is a targeted synthetic test. Great, but can you add one
that probes real kernel function like:
getsockname(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *usockaddr
or
getpeername(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *usockaddr > and the bpf prog tries to deref usockaddr ?

Ack. Will do.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux