Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:32 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some helper functions may modify its arguments, for example,
> bpf_d_path, bpf_get_stack etc. Previously, their argument types
> were marked as ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, which is compatible with read-only
> mem types, such as PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF. Therefore it's legitimate
> to modify a read-only memory by passing it into one of such helper
> functions.

I've added ", but technically incorrect" to the above sentence.
Otherwise it sounds like it was an ok thing to do.
I've considered adding a set of Fixes tag, but there would be too many
and it's a laborious task to look through all such helpers just
to beautify the commit log. This patch set isn't going to
be backported anyway due to complexity.

Please add a test to make sure that bpf_d_path on rdonly buf
is rejected.

Thank you very much for doing this work.
It's a great improvement to the verifier type handling.

There is a concern that generality of flags may cause
a regression, but no amount of code review will reveal that.
Please watch out for strange verifier issues.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux