Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log
level 1 to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@xxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6d6934fd91e6..d41b7db0d296 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2396,7 +2396,7 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx,
if (insn->code == 0)
return 0;
- if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL) {
+ if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) {
verbose(env, "regs=%x stack=%llx before ", *reg_mask, *stack_mask);
verbose(env, "%d: ", idx);
print_bpf_insn(&cbs, insn, env->allow_ptr_leaks);
@@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
new_marks = true;
reg->precise = true;
}
- if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL) {
+ if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) {
print_verifier_state(env, func);
verbose(env, "parent %s regs=%x stack=%llx marks\n",
new_marks ? "didn't have" : "already had",
--
2.30.2
