RE: [PATCH v19 bpf-next 19/23] bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> From: Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> The check for tail call map compatibility ensures that tail calls only
>> happen between maps of the same type. To ensure backwards compatibility for
>> XDP multi-buffer we need a similar type of check for cpumap and devmap
>> programs, so move the state from bpf_array_aux into bpf_map, add xdp_mb to
>> the check, and apply the same check to cpumap and devmap.
>> 
>> Co-developed-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> -bool bpf_prog_array_compatible(struct bpf_array *array, const struct bpf_prog *fp);
>> +static inline bool map_type_contains_progs(struct bpf_map *map)
>
> Maybe map_type_check_needed()? Just noticing that devmap doesn't contain
> progs.

Ah, but it does :)

See: fbee97feed9b ("bpf: Add support to attach bpf program to a devmap entry")

Indeed this feature is why this check is needed, so I think the name is
accurate...

-Toke




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux