Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/9] bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:22 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch introduce a flag MEM_RDONLY to tag a reg value
> pointing to read-only memory. It makes the following changes:
>
> 1. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF
> 2. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF | MEM_RDONLY
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h       |  8 +++--
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c          |  3 +-
>  kernel/bpf/map_iter.c     |  4 +--
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c     | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c |  2 +-
>  net/core/sock_map.c       |  2 +-
>  6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>

[...]

>  static bool arg_type_may_be_refcounted(enum bpf_arg_type type)
>  {
>         return type == ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON;
> @@ -541,8 +546,7 @@ static const char *reg_type_str(enum bpf_reg_type type)
>                 [PTR_TO_BTF_ID]         = "ptr_",
>                 [PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID]  = "percpu_ptr_",
>                 [PTR_TO_MEM]            = "mem",
> -               [PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF]     = "rdonly_buf",
> -               [PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF]       = "rdwr_buf",
> +               [PTR_TO_BUF]            = "rdwr_buf",

super misleading if it's actually read-only...

>                 [PTR_TO_FUNC]           = "func",
>                 [PTR_TO_MAP_KEY]        = "map_key",
>         };

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux