Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] bpf: Make CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF depend upon CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 6:47 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Vinicius Costa Gomes reported [0] that build fails when
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled and CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is disabled.
> This leads to btf.c not being compiled, and then no symbol being present
> in vmlinux for the declarations in btf.h. Since BTF is not useful
> without enabling BPF subsystem, disallow this combination.
>
> However, theoretically disabling both now could still fail, as the
> symbol for kfunc_btf_id_list variables is not available. This isn't a
> problem as the compiler usually optimizes the whole register/unregister
> call, but at lower optimization levels it can fail the build in linking
> stage.
>
> Fix that by adding dummy variables so that modules taking address of
> them still work, but the whole thing is a noop.
>
>   [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110205418.332403-1-vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Fixes: 14f267d95fe4 ("bpf: btf: Introduce helpers for dynamic BTF set registration")
> Reported-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux