You still have: > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c > index 585b2b77ccc4..f7359bcb8fa3 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void cpu_map_bpf_prog_run_skb(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu, > } > return; > default: > - bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act); > + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(skb->dev, rcpu->prog, act); > fallthrough; > case XDP_ABORTED: > trace_xdp_exception(skb->dev, rcpu->prog, act); > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int cpu_map_bpf_prog_run_xdp(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu, > } > break; > default: > - bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act); > + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(xdpf->dev_rx, rcpu->prog, act); > fallthrough; > case XDP_DROP: > xdp_return_frame(xdpf); > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c > index f02d04540c0c..79bcf2169881 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int dev_map_bpf_prog_run(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, > frames[nframes++] = xdpf; > break; > default: > - bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act); > + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(dev, xdp_prog, act); > fallthrough; > case XDP_ABORTED: > trace_xdp_exception(dev, xdp_prog, act); > @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static u32 dev_map_bpf_prog_run_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_dtab_netdev > __skb_push(skb, skb->mac_len); > break; > default: > - bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act); > + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(dst->dev, dst->xdp_prog, act); > fallthrough; > case XDP_ABORTED: > trace_xdp_exception(dst->dev, dst->xdp_prog, act); ... and ... > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c > index 3ba584bb23f8..658f7a84d9bc 100644 > --- a/net/core/filter.c > +++ b/net/core/filter.c > @@ -8179,13 +8179,13 @@ static bool xdp_is_valid_access(int off, int size, > return __is_valid_xdp_access(off, size); > } > > -void bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(u32 act) > +void bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 act) > { > const u32 act_max = XDP_REDIRECT; > > - pr_warn_once("%s XDP return value %u, expect packet loss!\n", > + pr_warn_once("%s XDP return value %u on prog %s (id %d) dev %s, expect packet loss!\n", > act > act_max ? "Illegal" : "Driver unsupported", > - act); > + act, prog->aux->name, prog->aux->id, dev->name); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action); This will still print the dev name for cpumap and devmap programs, which is misleading - it will have people looking at the drivers when the problem is somewhere else. I pointed this out multiple times in comments on your last revision so I'm a bit puzzled as to why you're still doing this? :/ Just pass NULL as the dev from cpumap/devmap and don't print the dev name in this case... -Toke