Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] bpf: let bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() report more info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 06:09:28PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> > -	pr_warn_once("%s XDP return value %u, expect packet loss!\n",
> >> > +	pr_warn_once("%s XDP return value %u on prog %d dev %s attach type %d, expect packet loss!\n",
> >> >  		     act > act_max ? "Illegal" : "Driver unsupported",
> >> > -		     act);
> >> > +		     act, prog->aux->id, dev->name, prog->expected_attach_type);
> >> 
> >> This will only ever trigger once per reboot even if the message differs,
> >> right? Which makes it less useful as a debugging aid; so I'm not sure if
> >> it's really worth it with this intrusive change unless we also do
> >> something to add a proper debugging aid (like a tracepoint)...
> >
> > Yes, the idea would be to add a tracepoint there, if there is general
> > agreement about this change.
> >
> > I think this patch is needed because the WARN_ONCE splat gives
> > implicitly information about the related driver and attach type.
> > Replacing with a simple printk we lose them.
> 
> Ah, right, good point. Pointing that out in the commit message might be
> a good idea; otherwise people may miss that ;)

Though it's quite a churn across the drivers I think extra verbosity here is justified.
I'd only suggest to print stable things. Like prog->aux->id probably has
little value for the person looking at the logs. That prog id is likely gone.
If it was prog->aux->name it would be more helpful.
Same with expected_attach_type. Why print it at all?
tracepoint is probably good idea too.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux