Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: fix a couple of missed btf_type_tag handling in libbpf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:39:32 -0800 you wrote:
> Commit 2dc1e488e5cd ("libbpf: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG") added
> BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG support. But BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG is not handled
> properly in libbpf btf_dedup_is_equiv() which will cause pahole dedup
> failure if the kernel has the following hack:
>   #define __user __attribute__((btf_type_tag("user")))
> 
> Patch 1 fixed the issue and Patch 2 added a test for it.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: fix a couple of missed btf_type_tag handling in btf.c
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/69a055d54615
  - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: add a dedup selftest with equivalent structure types
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4746158305e9

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux