Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpftool: Use $(OUTPUT) and not $(O) for VMLINUX_BTF_PATHS in Makefile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 18:59, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:46 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The Makefile for bpftool relies on $(OUTPUT), and not on $(O), for
> > passing the output directory. So $(VMLINUX_BTF_PATHS), used for
> > searching for kernel BTF info, should use the same variable.
> >
> > Fixes: 05aca6da3b5a ("tools/bpftool: Generalize BPF skeleton support and generate vmlinux.h")
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > index 2a846cb92120..40abf50b59d4 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ $(BOOTSTRAP_OBJS): $(LIBBPF_BOOTSTRAP)
> >  OBJS = $(patsubst %.c,$(OUTPUT)%.o,$(SRCS)) $(OUTPUT)disasm.o
> >  $(OBJS): $(LIBBPF) $(LIBBPF_INTERNAL_HDRS)
> >
> > -VMLINUX_BTF_PATHS ?= $(if $(O),$(O)/vmlinux)                           \
> > +VMLINUX_BTF_PATHS ?= $(if $(OUTPUT),$(OUTPUT)/vmlinux)                 \
> >                      $(if $(KBUILD_OUTPUT),$(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/vmlinux)    \
>
> But you still check KBUILD_OUTPUT? O overrides KBUILD_OUTPUT as far as
> kernel build goes. So if you still support KBUILD_OUTPUT, you should
> support O. And the $(OUTPUT) seems to be completely unrelated, as that
> defines the output of bpftool build files, not the vmlinux image. Or
> am I missing something?

OK, I think I'm the one who missed the point. I simply figured we
meant to search the output directory, and that it should be $(OUTPUT)
like everywhere else in the Makefile. But from what I understand now,
it's not the case. Let's drop this patch.

If the rest of the set looks good to you, can you just skip this
patch, or do you prefer me to send a v2?

Quentin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux