Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/12] libbpf: pass number of prog load attempts explicitly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/3/21 6:08 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:   
> Allow to control number of BPF_PROG_LOAD attempts from outside the
> sys_bpf_prog_load() helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> index c09cbb868c9f..8e6a23c42560 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> @@ -74,14 +74,15 @@ static inline int sys_bpf_fd(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
>  	return ensure_good_fd(fd);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int sys_bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
> +#define PROG_LOAD_ATTEMPTS 5
> +
> +static inline int sys_bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size, int attempts)

nit: Should attempts be unsigned? Although, with the pre-decrement below, I can
see the case for leaving as is.

Regardless,

Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>

>  {
> -	int retries = 5;
>  	int fd;
>  
>  	do {
>  		fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_PROG_LOAD, attr, size);
> -	} while (fd < 0 && errno == EAGAIN && retries-- > 0);
> +	} while (fd < 0 && errno == EAGAIN && --attempts > 0);
>  
>  	return fd;
>  }

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux