On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:03 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/21 3:21 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Similar to unsigned bounds propagation fix signed bounds.
> > The 'Fixes' tag is a hint. There is no security bug here.
> > The verifier was too conservative.
> >
> > Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
> > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The change looks good. Should a new test_verifier test be added
> to exercise the new change?
I think manually string comparing output the way VERBOSE_ACCEPT is doing
is an overkill here.
The real test case in .c will take some time to craft.
