Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: introduce helper bpf_find_vma

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/21 12:00 AM, Song Liu wrote:
[...]
  /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index b48750bfba5aa..ad30f2e885356 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  #include <linux/fdtable.h>
  #include <linux/filter.h>
  #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common {
  	struct pid_namespace *ns;
@@ -21,6 +22,25 @@ struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info {
  	u32 tid;
  };
+/* irq_work to run mmap_read_unlock() */
+struct task_iter_irq_work {
+	struct irq_work irq_work;
+	struct mm_struct *mm;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_iter_irq_work, mmap_unlock_work);
+
+static void do_mmap_read_unlock(struct irq_work *entry)
+{
+	struct task_iter_irq_work *work;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)))
+		return;
+
+	work = container_of(entry, struct task_iter_irq_work, irq_work);
+	mmap_read_unlock_non_owner(work->mm);
+}
+
  static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct pid_namespace *ns,
  					     u32 *tid,
  					     bool skip_if_dup_files)
@@ -586,9 +606,89 @@ static struct bpf_iter_reg task_vma_reg_info = {
  	.seq_info		= &task_vma_seq_info,
  };
+BPF_CALL_5(bpf_find_vma, struct task_struct *, task, u64, start,
+	   bpf_callback_t, callback_fn, void *, callback_ctx, u64, flags)
+{
+	struct task_iter_irq_work *work = NULL;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;

Won't this NULL deref if called with task argument as NULL?

+	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+	bool irq_work_busy = false;
+	int ret = -ENOENT;
+
+	if (flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!mm)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	/*
+	 * Similar to stackmap with build_id support, we cannot simply do
+	 * mmap_read_unlock when the irq is disabled. Instead, we need do
+	 * the unlock in the irq_work.
+	 */
+	if (irqs_disabled()) {
+		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
+			work = this_cpu_ptr(&mmap_unlock_work);
+			if (irq_work_is_busy(&work->irq_work)) {
+				/* cannot queue more mmap_unlock, abort. */
+				irq_work_busy = true;
+			}
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * PREEMPT_RT does not allow to trylock mmap sem in
+			 * interrupt disabled context, abort.
+			 */
+			irq_work_busy = true;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (irq_work_busy || !mmap_read_trylock(mm))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	vma = find_vma(mm, start);
+
+	if (vma && vma->vm_start <= start && vma->vm_end > start) {
+		callback_fn((u64)(long)task, (u64)(long)vma,
+			    (u64)(long)callback_ctx, 0, 0);
+		ret = 0;
+	}
+	if (!work) {
+		mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
+	} else {
+		work->mm = current->mm;
+
+		/* The lock will be released once we're out of interrupt
+		 * context. Tell lockdep that we've released it now so
+		 * it doesn't complain that we forgot to release it.
+		 */
+		rwsem_release(&current->mm->mmap_lock.dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+		irq_work_queue(&work->irq_work);
+	}

Given this is pretty much the same logic around the vma retrieval, could this be
refactored/consolidated with stack map build id retrieval into a common function?

+	return ret;
+}
+
+BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(btf_find_vma_ids, struct, task_struct)
+
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_find_vma_proto = {
+	.func		= bpf_find_vma,
+	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
+	.arg1_btf_id	= &btf_find_vma_ids[0],
+	.arg2_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+	.arg3_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_FUNC,
+	.arg4_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL,
+	.arg5_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
[...]
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c108200378834..056c00da1b5d6 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4915,6 +4915,24 @@ union bpf_attr {
   *		Dynamically cast a *sk* pointer to a *unix_sock* pointer.
   *	Return
   *		*sk* if casting is valid, or **NULL** otherwise.
+ * long bpf_find_vma(struct task_struct *task, u64 addr, void *callback_fn, void *callback_ctx, u64 flags)

nit: Wrongly copied uapi header over to tooling?

+ *	Description
+ *		Find vma of *task* that contains *addr*, call *callback_fn*
+ *		function with *task*, *vma*, and *callback_ctx*.
+ *		The *callback_fn* should be a static function and
+ *		the *callback_ctx* should be a pointer to the stack.
+ *		The *flags* is used to control certain aspects of the helper.
+ *		Currently, the *flags* must be 0.
+ *
+ *		The expected callback signature is
+ *
+ *		long (\*callback_fn)(struct task_struct \*task, struct vm_area_struct \*vma, void \*ctx);
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		0 on success.
+ *		**-ENOENT** if *task->mm* is NULL, or no vma contains *addr*.
+ *		**-EBUSY** if failed to try lock mmap_lock.
+ *		**-EINVAL** for invalid **flags**.
   */
  #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
  	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5096,6 +5114,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
  	FN(get_branch_snapshot),	\
  	FN(trace_vprintk),		\
  	FN(skc_to_unix_sock),		\
+	FN(find_vma),			\
  	/* */
/* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux