Re: [PATCH bpf-next 01/14] bpftool: fix unistd.h include

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 7:12 AM Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021/10/30 12:59 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > cgroup.c in bpftool source code is defining _XOPEN_SOURCE 500, which,
> > apparently, makes syscall() unavailable. Which is a problem now that
> > libbpf exposes syscal()-usign bpf() API in bpf.h.
> >
>
> typo:
>   syscal -> syscall
>   usign -> using ?
>

Thanks, will fix.

> > Fix by defining _GNU_SOURCE instead, which enables syscall() wrapper.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c
> > index 3571a281c43f..4876364e753d 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> >  // Copyright (C) 2017 Facebook
> >  // Author: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
> >
> > -#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500
> > +#define _GNU_SOURCE
>
>
> >  #include <errno.h>
> >  #include <fcntl.h>
> >  #include <ftw.h>
> >
>
> According to the man page ([0]), defining _GNU_SOURCE also implicitly defines
> _XOPEN_SOURCE with the value 700 (600 in glibc versions before 2.10; 500 in glibc
> versions before 2.2), so this change should not break anything.

Cool, thanks for checking.

>
>   [0]: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/feature_test_macros.7.html
>
> --Hengqi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux