Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined __BYTE_ORDER for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 1d64891e6492..d425688cf59c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args) } #endif -#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ #define syscall_arg(_n) (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[_n])) -#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN +#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ #define syscall_arg(_n) (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[_n]) + sizeof(__u32)) #else -#error "wut? Unknown __BYTE_ORDER?!" +#error "wut? Unknown __BYTE_ORDER__?!" #endif #define SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED 0xbadbeef -- 2.31.1
