Re: [PATCH 3/3] bpf: Implement prealloc for task_local_storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:47:33PM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
...
> > +	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> I am thinking if this loop can be done in bpf iter.
> 
> If the bpf_local_storage_map is sleepable safe (not yet done but there is
> an earlier attempt [0]),  bpf_local_storage_update() should be able to
> alloc without GFP_ATOMIC by sleepable bpf prog and this potentially
> will be useful in general for other sleepable use cases.
> 
> For example, if a sleepable bpf iter prog can run in this loop (or the existing
> bpf task iter loop is as good?), the iter bpf prog can call
> bpf_task_storage_get(BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE) on a sleepable
> bpf_local_storage_map.

Yeah, whatever that can walk all the existing tasks should do, and I think
the locked section can be shrunk too.

        percpu_down_write(&threadgroup_rwsem);
        list_add_tail(&smap->prealloc_node, &prealloc_smaps);
        percpu_up_write(&threadgroup_rwsem);

        // Here, it's guaranteed that all new tasks are guaranteed to
        // prealloc on fork.

        Iterate all tasks in whatever way and allocate if necessary;

Thanks.

-- 
tejun



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux