On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:03:33AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > I nicked it from emit_bpf_tail_call() in the 32bit jit :-) It seemed a > > lot more robust than the 64bit one and I couldn't figure out why the > > difference. > > Interesting. Daniel will recognize that trick then :) > > Is there concurrency on the jit? > > The JIT of different progs can happen in parallel. In that case I don't think the patch is safe. I'll see if I can find a variant that doesn't use static storage.
