On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:26 AM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fix some inconsistencies of bpf_jit_limit on non-x86 platforms. > I've dropped exposing bpf_jit_current since we couldn't agree on > file modes, correct names, etc. Applied to bpf tree. Seems more appropriate there.
