On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:09 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012023218.399568-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > v1 -> v2: > - Remove redundant local variables, use t->size directly instead. > - Add btf__align_of() patch. > Pending questions: > - Can things like defined(__i386__) break cross-compilation? > - Why exactly do we need both cpu_number and cpu_profile_flip? If we do, > is there a suitable replacement for cpu_number in common code? > > --- > > Hi, > > This series along with [1] and [2] fixes all the failures in the > btf_dump testsuite currently present on s390, in particular: > > * [1] fixes intermittent build bug causing "failed to encode tag ..." > * error messages. > * [2] fixes missing VAR entries on s390. > * Patch 1 disables Intel-specific code in a testcase. > * Patch 2 fixes an endianness-related bug. > * Patch 3 fixes an alignment-related bug. > * Patch 4 improves overly pessimistic alignment handling. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012022521.399302-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012022637.399365-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Best regards, > Ilya > > Ilya Leoshkevich (4): > selftests/bpf: Use cpu_number only on arches that have it > libbpf: Fix dumping big-endian bitfields > libbpf: Fix dumping non-aligned __int128 > libbpf: Fix ptr_is_aligned() usages > > tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 34 +++++++++---------- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.31.1 > I've dropped patch 4 for now, applied the first three to bpf-next, thanks.
