Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Oct 14, 2021, at 1:56 PM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet.
> Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them
> together.
> 
> In c48e51c8b07a ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"),
> I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF
> object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when
> included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a
> separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of
> subtests.
> 
> Change that by appending a "_light" suffix to the name for files listed
> in LSKELS_EXTRA, such that both light and libbpf skeleton can be used in
> the same file for subtests, leading to better code sharing.
> 
> While at it, improve the build output by saying GEN-LSKEL instead of
> GEN-SKEL for light skeleton generation recipe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux