> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:49:38 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > >> Changes since v14: > >> - intrudce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine and > >> bpf_xdp_load_bytes/bpf_xdp_store_bytes helpers > >> - drop bpf_xdp_adjust_data helper > >> - drop xdp_frags_truesize in skb_shared_info > >> - explode bpf_xdp_mb_adjust_tail in bpf_xdp_mb_increase_tail and > >> bpf_xdp_mb_shrink_tail > > > > I thought the conclusion of the discussion regarding backward > > compatibility was that we should require different program type > > or other explicit opt in. Did I misinterpret? > > No, you're right. I think we settled on using the 'flags' field instead > of program type, but either way this should be part of the initial patch > set. ops, right. I will add it in the v16. Sorry for the noise. Are you fine with bpf_xdp_load_bytes/bpf_xdp_store_bytes proposed solution? Regards, Lorenzo > > -Toke >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
