From: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx> This make this test more likely to succeed. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c index 6b2e3dced619..d7e88b2c5f36 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static void check_good_sample(struct test_perf_branches *skel) int duration = 0; if (CHECK(!skel->bss->valid, "output not valid", - "no valid sample from prog")) + "no valid sample from prog\n")) return; /* @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void check_bad_sample(struct test_perf_branches *skel) int duration = 0; if (CHECK(!skel->bss->valid, "output not valid", - "no valid sample from prog")) + "no valid sample from prog\n")) return; CHECK((required_size != -EINVAL && required_size != -ENOENT), @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void test_perf_branches_common(int perf_fd, if (CHECK(err, "set_affinity", "cpu #0, err %d\n", err)) goto out_destroy; /* spin the loop for a while (random high number) */ - for (i = 0; i < 1000000; ++i) + for (i = 0; i < 100000000; ++i) ++j; test_perf_branches__detach(skel); -- 2.30.2
