Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 10/4/21 12:49 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> On 9/29/21 1:18 PM, Hari Bathini wrote: >>>> Patch #1 & #2 are simple cleanup patches. Patch #3 refactors JIT >>>> compiler code with the aim to simplify adding BPF_PROBE_MEM support. >>>> Patch #4 introduces PPC_RAW_BRANCH() macro instead of open coding >>>> branch instruction. Patch #5 & #7 add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for PPC64 >>>> & PPC32 JIT compilers respectively. Patch #6 & #8 handle bad userspace >>>> pointers for PPC64 & PPC32 cases respectively. >>> >>> Michael, are you planning to pick up the series or shall we route via bpf-next? >> >> Yeah I'll plan to take it, unless you think there is a strong reason it >> needs to go via the bpf tree (doesn't look like it from the diffstat). > > Sounds good to me, in that case, please also route the recent JIT fixes from > Naveen through your tree. Will do. cheers
