Le 29/09/2021 à 13:18, Hari Bathini a écrit :
With KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to access userspace
needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP. But that is not
happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction. Though PPC32 does not
support read protection, considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID
(which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer
or NULL but should never be a pointer to userspace address, execute
BPF_PROBE_MEM load only if addr is kernel address, otherwise set
dst_reg=0 and move on.
This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad
kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table.
[Alexei suggested for x86]
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v4:
* Adjusted the emit code to avoid using temporary reg.
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 6ee13a09c70d..2ac81563c78d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -818,6 +818,40 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
+ /*
+ * As PTR_TO_BTF_ID that uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode could either be a valid
+ * kernel pointer or NULL but not a userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM
+ * load only if addr is kernel address (see is_kernel_addr()), otherwise
+ * set dst_reg=0 and move on.
+ */
+ if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
+ PPC_LI32(_R0, TASK_SIZE - off);
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(src_reg, _R0));
+ PPC_BCC(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 5) * 4);
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0));
+ /*
+ * For BPF_DW case, "li reg_h,0" would be needed when
+ * !fp->aux->verifier_zext. Emit NOP otherwise.
+ *
+ * Note that "li reg_h,0" is emitted for BPF_B/H/W case,
+ * if necessary. So, jump there insted of emitting an
+ * additional "li reg_h,0" instruction.
+ */
+ if (size == BPF_DW && !fp->aux->verifier_zext)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg_h, 0));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+ /*
+ * Need to jump two instructions instead of one for BPF_DW case
+ * as there are two load instructions for dst_reg_h & dst_reg
+ * respectively.
+ */
+ if (size == BPF_DW)
+ PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
+ else
+ PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 2) * 4);
+ }
+
switch (size) {
case BPF_B:
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off));
