Re: bpf_get_branch_snapshot on qemu-kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:04:21AM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> Hi Peter, 
> 
> We have see the warning below while testing the new bpf_get_branch_snapshot 
> helper, on a QEMU vm (/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu host ...). 
> This issue doesn't happen on bare metal systems (no QEMU). 
> 
> We didn't cover this case, as LBR didn't really work in QEMU. But it seems to
> work after I upgrade the host kernel to 5.12. 
> 
> At the moment, we don't have much idea on how to debug and fix the issue. Could 
> you please share your thoughts on this? 

Well, that's virt, afaik stuff not working is like a feature there or
something, who knows. I've Cc'ed Like Xu who might have clue since he
did the patches.

Virt just ain't worth the pain if you ask me.

> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Song
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ============================== 8< ============================
> 
> [  139.494159] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x3f1 (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) at rIP: 0xffffffff81011a8b (intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack+0x3b/0xd0)
> [  139.495587] Call Trace:
> [  139.495845]  bpf_get_branch_snapshot+0x17/0x40
> [  139.496285]  bpf_prog_35810402cd1d294c_test1+0x33/0xe6c
> [  139.496791]  bpf_trampoline_10737534536_0+0x4c/0x1000
> [  139.497274]  bpf_testmod_loop_test+0x5/0x20 [bpf_testmod]
> [  139.497799]  bpf_testmod_test_read+0x71/0x1f0 [bpf_testmod]
> [  139.498332]  ? bpf_testmod_loop_test+0x20/0x20 [bpf_testmod]
> [  139.498878]  ? sysfs_kf_bin_read+0xbe/0x110
> [  139.499284]  ? bpf_testmod_loop_test+0x20/0x20 [bpf_testmod]
> [  139.499829]  kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x1ac/0x2c0
> [  139.500245]  ? kernfs_create_link+0x110/0x110
> [  139.500667]  new_sync_read+0x24b/0x360
> [  139.501037]  ? __x64_sys_llseek+0x1e0/0x1e0
> [  139.501444]  ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0x1a/0x50
> [  139.501942]  ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0x1a/0x50
> [  139.502404]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5f/0xd0
> [  139.502865]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
> [  139.503294]  ? security_file_permission+0xe7/0x2c0
> [  139.503758]  vfs_read+0x1a4/0x2a0
> [  139.504091]  ksys_read+0xc0/0x160
> [  139.504413]  ? vfs_write+0x510/0x510
> [  139.504756]  ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xe4/0xf0
> [  139.505234]  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
> [  139.505581]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> [  139.506066] RIP: 0033:0x7fb8a05728b2
> [  139.506413] Code: 97 20 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b6 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 8b 05 96 db 20 00 85 c0 75 12 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 49 89 d4 55 48 89
> [  139.508164] RSP: 002b:00007ffe66315a28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
> [  139.508870] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb8a05728b2
> [  139.509545] RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000010
> [  139.510225] RBP: 00007ffe66315a60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe66315907
> [  139.510897] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000040c8b0
> [  139.511570] R13: 00007ffe66315cc0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux