RE: [PATCH v3] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cong Wang [mailto:xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:52 PM
> To: liujian (CE) <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Borkmann
> <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lorenz
> Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrii
> Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>; Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>; Song Liu
> <songliubraving@xxxxxx>; Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>; KP Singh
> <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Network Developers
> <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress
> 
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:32 AM Liu Jian <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  static void sk_psock_skb_state(struct sk_psock *psock, @@ -604,6
> > +608,9 @@ static void sk_psock_backlog(struct work_struct *work)  {
> >         struct sk_psock *psock = container_of(work, struct sk_psock, work);
> >         struct sk_psock_work_state *state = &psock->work_state;
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
> > +       struct strp_msg *stm = NULL;
> > +#endif
> >         struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
> >         bool ingress;
> >         u32 len, off;
> > @@ -624,6 +631,13 @@ static void sk_psock_backlog(struct work_struct
> *work)
> >         while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&psock->ingress_skb))) {
> >                 len = skb->len;
> >                 off = 0;
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
> > +               if (skb_bpf_strparser(skb)) {
> 
> If CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER is disabled, this should always return false,
> hence you don't need this #ifdef.
> Or alternatively, you can at least define for nop for
> skb_bpf_strparser() if !CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER.
> And you can move the above "stm" down here too.
> 
V4 has been sent, thank you~

> (Ditto for the other place below.)
> 
> Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux