In order to keep ahead of cases in the kernel where Control Flow Integrity (CFI) may trip over function call casts, enabling -Wcast-function-type is helpful. To that end, BPF_CAST_CALL causes various warnings and is one of the last places in the kernel triggering this warning. Most places using BPF_CAST_CALL actually just want a void * to perform math on. It's not actually performing a call, so just use a different helper to get the void *, by way of the new BPF_CALL_IMM() helper, which can clean up a common copy/paste idiom as well. This change results in no object code difference. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/20 Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAEf4Bzb46=-J5Fxc3mMZ8JQPtK1uoE0q6+g6WPz53Cvx=CBEhw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- include/linux/filter.h | 6 +++++- kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 6 +++--- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 26 +++++++++----------------- lib/test_bpf.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 4a93c12543ee..6c247663d4ce 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -365,13 +365,17 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn) #define BPF_CAST_CALL(x) \ ((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))(x)) +/* Convert function address to BPF immediate */ + +#define BPF_CALL_IMM(x) ((void *)(x) - (void *)__bpf_call_base) + #define BPF_EMIT_CALL(FUNC) \ ((struct bpf_insn) { \ .code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, \ .dst_reg = 0, \ .src_reg = 0, \ .off = 0, \ - .imm = ((FUNC) - __bpf_call_base) }) + .imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(FUNC) }) /* Raw code statement block */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c index 32471ba02708..3d8f9d6997d5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static int htab_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf) BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem, (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); - *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem)); + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem); *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 1); *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret, offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) + @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static int htab_lru_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem, (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); - *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem)); + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem); *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 4); *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret, offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) + @@ -2397,7 +2397,7 @@ static int htab_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem, (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); - *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem)); + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem); *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 2); *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret, offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) + diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 7a8351604f67..1433752db740 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ static int add_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 func_id) desc = &tab->descs[tab->nr_descs++]; desc->func_id = func_id; - desc->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(addr) - __bpf_call_base; + desc->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(addr); err = btf_distill_func_proto(&env->log, btf_vmlinux, func_proto, func_name, &desc->func_model); @@ -12514,8 +12514,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn)) continue; subprog = insn->off; - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(func[subprog]->bpf_func) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(func[subprog]->bpf_func); } /* we use the aux data to keep a list of the start addresses @@ -12995,32 +12994,25 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) patch_map_ops_generic: switch (insn->imm) { case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_lookup_elem) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_lookup_elem); continue; case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_update_elem) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_update_elem); continue; case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_delete_elem) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_delete_elem); continue; case BPF_FUNC_map_push_elem: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_push_elem) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_push_elem); continue; case BPF_FUNC_map_pop_elem: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_pop_elem) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_pop_elem); continue; case BPF_FUNC_map_peek_elem: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_peek_elem) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_peek_elem); continue; case BPF_FUNC_redirect_map: - insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_redirect) - - __bpf_call_base; + insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(ops->map_redirect); continue; } diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index 08f438e6fe9e..21ea1ab253a1 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -12439,7 +12439,7 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs) err = -EFAULT; goto out_err; } - *insn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(addr)); + *insn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(addr); if ((long)__bpf_call_base + insn->imm != addr) *insn = BPF_JMP_A(0); /* Skip: NOP */ break; -- 2.30.2
