Re: [PATCH] samples/bpf: relicense bpf_insn.h as GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Acked-by:  Chenbo Feng <fengc@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:12 PM Chenbo Feng <fengc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Acked-by:  Chenbo Feng <fengc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:10 PM Joe Stringer <joe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 02:42, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 02:06, <luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> libbpf and bpftool have been dual-licensed to facilitate inclusion in
>> >> software that is not compatible with GPL2-only (ie: Apache2), but the
>> >> samples are still GPL2-only.
>> >>
>> >> Given these files are samples, they get naturally copied around. For example
>> >> it is the case for samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h which was copied into the systemd
>> >> tree: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/src/shared/linux/bpf_insn.h
>> >>
>> >> Dual-license this header as GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause to follow
>> >> the same licensing used by libbpf and bpftool:
>> >>
>> >> 1bc38b8ff6cc ("libbpf: relicense libbpf as LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause")
>> >> 907b22365115 ("tools: bpftool: dual license all files")
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> Most of systemd is (L)GPL2-or-later, which means there is no perceived
>> >> incompatibility with Apache2 softwares and can thus be linked with
>> >> OpenSSL 3.0. But given this GPL2-only header is included this is currently
>> >> not possible.
>> >> Dual-licensing this header solves this problem for us as we are scoping
>> >> moving to OpenSSL 3.0, see:
>> >>
>> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2021-September/046882.html
>> >>
>> >> The authors of this file according to git log are:
>> >>
>> >> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> >
>> > Acked-by:  Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> >> Chenbo Feng <fengc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Joe Stringer <joe@xxxxxxx>
>> >> Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> (excludes a commit adding the SPDX header)
>> >>
>> >> All authors and maintainers are CC'ed. An Acked-by from everyone in the
>> >> above list of authors will be necessary.
>> >>
>> >> One could probably argue for relicensing all the samples/bpf/ files given both
>> >> libbpf and bpftool are, however the authors list would be much larger and thus
>> >> it would be much more difficult, so I'd really appreciate if this header could
>> >> be handled first by itself, as it solves a real license incompatibility issue
>> >> we are currently facing.
>> >>
>> >>  samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h | 2 +-
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h b/samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h
>> >> index aee04534483a..29c3bb6ad1cd 100644
>> >> --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h
>> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h
>> >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
>> >>  /* eBPF instruction mini library */
>> >>  #ifndef __BPF_INSN_H
>> >>  #define __BPF_INSN_H
>> >> --
>> >> 2.33.0
>> >>
>>
>> Acked-by: Joe Stringer <joe@xxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux