Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: allow skipping attach_func_name in bpf_program__set_attach_target()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:10 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:17 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/15/21 6:58 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > Allow to use bpf_program__set_attach_target to only set target attach
> > > program FD, while letting libbpf to use target attach function name from
> > > SEC() definition. This might be useful for some scenarios where
> > > bpf_object contains multiple related freplace BPF programs intended to
> > > replace different sub-programs in target BPF program. In such case all
> > > programs will have the same attach_prog_fd, but different
> > > attach_func_name. It's conveninent to specify such target function names
> >
> > typo: conveninent => convenient
> >
> > > declaratively in SEC() definitions, but attach_prog_fd is a dynamic
> > > runtime setting.
> > >
> > > To simplify such scenario, allow bpf_program__set_attach_target() to
> > > delay BTF ID resolution till the BPF program load time by providing NULL
> > > attach_func_name. In that case the behavior will be similar to using
> > > bpf_object_open_opts.attach_prog_fd (which is marked deprecated since
> > > v0.7), but has the benefit of allowing more control by user in what is
> > > attached to what. Such setup allows having BPF programs attached to
> > > different target attach_prog_fd with target funtions still declaratively
>
> Applied with "conveninent" and "funtions" typos fixed.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux