Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:57:05 -0700
Cc: <kernel-team@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210916015836.1248906-3-andrii@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0



On 9/15/21 6:58 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

relaxed_core_relocs option hasn't had any effect for a while now, stop
specifying it. Next patch marks it as deprecated.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>


Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Improve set_attach_target() and deprecate open_opts.attach_prog_fd
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko
- [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/10] bpf: Bump MAX_BPF_STACK size to 768 bytes
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] libbpf: deprecated bpf_object_open_opts.relaxed_core_relocs
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: allow skipping attach_func_name in bpf_program__set_attach_target()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux