Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/3] perf: enable branch record for software events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> The below seems to cure that.

Seems I lost a hunk, fold below.

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 9e6d6eaeb4cb..6b72e9b55c69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -228,20 +228,6 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_enable(bool pmi)
 		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL, lbr_select | ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN);
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_disable(void)
-{
-	u64 debugctl;
-
-	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR)) {
-		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL, 0);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl);
-	debugctl &= ~(DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI);
-	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl);
-}
-
 void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_32(void)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -779,8 +765,12 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (cpuc->lbr_users && !vlbr_exclude_host())
+	if (cpuc->lbr_users && !vlbr_exclude_host()) {
+		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+			return __intel_pmu_arch_lbr_disable();
+
 		__intel_pmu_lbr_disable();
+	}
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux