Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/20] selftests: xsk: facilitate adding tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 09:19:08AM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> This patch set facilitates adding new tests as well as describing
> existing ones in the xsk selftests suite and adds 3 new test suites at
> the end. The idea is to isolate the run-time that executes the test
> from the actual implementation of the test. Today, implementing a test
> amounts to adding test specific if-statements all around the run-time,
> which is not scalable or amenable for reuse. This patch set instead
> introduces a test specification that is the only thing that a test
> fills in. The run-time then gets this specification and acts upon it
> completely unaware of what test it is executing. This way, we can get
> rid of all test specific if-statements from the run-time and the
> implementation of the test can be contained in a single function. This
> hopefully makes it easier to add tests and for users to understand
> what the test accomplishes.
> 
> As a recap of what the run-time does: each test is based on the
> run-time launching two threads and connecting a veth link between the
> two threads. Each thread opens an AF_XDP socket on that veth interface
> and one of them sends traffic that the other one receives and
> validates. Each thread has its own umem. Note that this behavior is
> not changed by this patch set.
> 
> A test specification consists of several items. Most importantly:
> 
> * Two packet streams. One for Tx thread that specifies what traffic to
>   send and one for the Rx thread that specifies what that thread
>   should receive. If it receives exactly what is specified, the test
>   passes, otherwise it fails. A packet stream can also specify what
>   buffers in the umem that should be used by the Rx and Tx threads.
> 
> * What kind of AF_XDP sockets it should create and bind to what
>   interfaces
> 
> * How many times it should repeat the socket creation and destruction
> 
> * The name of the test
> 
> The interface for the test spec is the following:
> 
> void test_spec_init(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj_tx,
>                     struct ifobject *ifobj_rx, enum test_mode mode);
> 
> /* Reset everything but the interface specifications and the mode */
> void test_spec_reset(struct test_spec *test);
> 
> void test_spec_set_name(struct test_spec *test, const char *name);
> 
> 
> Packet streams have the following interfaces:
> 
> struct pkt *pkt_stream_get_pkt(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, u32 pkt_nb)
> 
> struct pkt *pkt_stream_get_next_rx_pkt(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream)
> 
> struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info *umem,
>                                        u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len);
> 
> void pkt_stream_delete(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream);
> 
> struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_clone(struct xsk_umem_info *umem,
>                                     struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream);
> 
> /* Replaces all packets in the stream*/
> void pkt_stream_replace(struct test_spec *test, u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len);
> 
> /* Replaces every other packet in the stream */
> void pkt_stream_replace_half(struct test_spec *test, u32 pkt_len, u32 offset);
> 
> /* For creating custom made packet streams */
> void pkt_stream_generate_custom(struct test_spec *test, struct pkt *pkts,
>                                 u32 nb_pkts);
> 
> /* Restores the default packet stream */
> void pkt_stream_restore_default(struct test_spec *test);
> 
> 
> A test can then then in the most basic case described like this
> (provided the test specification has been created before calling the
> function):
> 
> static bool testapp_aligned(struct test_spec *test)
> {
>         test_spec_set_name(test, "RUN_TO_COMPLETION");
>         testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> }
> 
> Running the same test in unaligned mode would then look like this:
> 
> static bool testapp_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
> {
>         if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) {
>                 ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n");
>                 return false;
>         }
> 
>         test_spec_set_name(test, "UNALIGNED_MODE");
>         test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
>         test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
>         /* Let half of the packets straddle a buffer boundrary */
>         pkt_stream_replace_half(test, PKT_SIZE,
>                                 XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE - 32);
> 	/* Populate fill ring with addresses in the packet stream */
>         test->ifobj_rx->pkt_stream->use_addr_for_fill = true;
>         testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> 
>         pkt_stream_restore_default(test);
> 	return true;
> }
> 
> 3 of the last 4 patches in the set add 3 new test suites, one for
> unaligned mode, one for testing the rejection of tricky invalid
> descriptors plus the acceptance of some valid ones in the Tx ring, and
> one for testing 2K frame sizes (the default is 4K).
> 
> What is left to do for follow-up patches:
> 
> * Convert the statistics tests to the new framework.
> 
> * Implement a way of registering new tests without having the enum
>   test_type. Once this has been done (together with the previous
>   bullet), all the test types can be dropped from the header
>   file. This means that we should be able to add tests by just writing
>   a single function with a new test specification, which is one of the
>   goals.
> 
> * Introduce functions for manipulating parts of the test or interface
>   spec instead of direct manipulations such as
>   test->ifobj_rx->pkt_stream->use_addr_for_fill = true; which is kind
>   of awkward.
> 
> * Move the run-time and its interface to its own .c and .h files. Then
>   we can have all the tests in a separate file.
> 
> * Better error reporting if a test fails. Today it does not state what
>   test fails and might not continue execute the rest of the tests due
>   to this failure. Failures are not propagated upwards through the
>   functions so a failed test will also be a passed test, which messes
>   up the stats counting. This needs to be changed.
> 
> * Add option to run specific test instead of all of them
> 
> * Introduce pacing of sent packets so that they are never dropped
>   by the receiver even if it is stalled for some reason. If you run
>   the current tests on a heavily loaded system, they might fail in SKB
>   mode due to packets being dropped by the driver on Tx. Though I have
>   never seen it, it might happen.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 
> * Fixed a number of spelling errors [Maciej]
> * Fixed use after free bug in pkt_stream_replace() [Maciej]
> * pkt_stream_set -> pkt_stream_generate_custom [Maciej]
> * Fixed formatting problem in testapp_invalid_desc() [Maciej]
> 
> Thanks: Magnus

I like the flexibility that this set is bringing to xdpxceiver.
Went through the v2 and this LGTM.

Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Magnus Karlsson (20):
>   selftests: xsk: simplify xsk and umem arrays
>   selftests: xsk: introduce type for thread function
>   selftests: xsk: introduce test specifications
>   selftests: xsk: move num_frames and frame_headroom to xsk_umem_info
>   selftests: xsk: move rxqsize into xsk_socket_info
>   selftests: xsk: make frame_size configurable
>   selftests: xsx: introduce test name in test spec
>   selftests: xsk: add use_poll to ifobject
>   selftests: xsk: introduce rx_on and tx_on in ifobject
>   selftests: xsk: replace second_step global variable
>   selftests: xsk: specify number of sockets to create
>   selftests: xsk: make xdp_flags and bind_flags local
>   selftests: xsx: make pthreads local scope
>   selftests: xsk: eliminate MAX_SOCKS define
>   selftests: xsk: allow for invalid packets
>   selftests: xsk: introduce replacing the default packet stream
>   selftests: xsk: add test for unaligned mode
>   selftests: xsk: eliminate test specific if-statement in test runner
>   selftests: xsk: add tests for invalid xsk descriptors
>   selftests: xsk: add tests for 2K frame size
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 872 +++++++++++++++--------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h |  66 +-
>  2 files changed, 608 insertions(+), 330 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 27151f177827d478508e756c7657273261aaf8a9
> --
> 2.29.0



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux