On 9/8/21 6:44 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
Current bpf-next bpf selftest "get_stack_raw_tp" triggered the warning:
[ 1411.304463] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 140 at include/linux/mmap_lock.h:164 find_vma+0x47/0xa0
[ 1411.304469] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(O) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod]
[ 1411.304476] CPU: 3 PID: 140 Comm: systemd-journal Tainted: G W O 5.14.0+ #53
[ 1411.304479] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 1411.304481] RIP: 0010:find_vma+0x47/0xa0
[ 1411.304484] Code: de 48 89 ef e8 ba f5 fe ff 48 85 c0 74 2e 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d c3 48 8d bf 28 01 00 00 be ff ff ff ff e8 2d 9f d8 00 85 c0 75 d4 <0f> 0b 48 89 de 48 8
[ 1411.304487] RSP: 0018:ffffabd440403db8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 1411.304490] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f00ad80a0e0 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 1411.304492] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9776b144 RDI: ffffffff977e1b0e
[ 1411.304494] RBP: ffff9cf5c2f50000 R08: ffff9cf5c3eb25d8 R09: 00000000fffffffe
[ 1411.304496] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000ef974e19 R12: ffff9cf5c39ae0e0
[ 1411.304498] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9cf5c39ae0e0
[ 1411.304501] FS: 00007f00ae754780(0000) GS:ffff9cf5fba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1411.304504] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1411.304506] CR2: 000000003e34343c CR3: 0000000103a98005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[ 1411.304508] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 1411.304510] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 1411.304512] Call Trace:
[ 1411.304517] stack_map_get_build_id_offset+0x17c/0x260
[ 1411.304528] __bpf_get_stack+0x18f/0x230
[ 1411.304541] bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x5a/0x70
[ 1411.305752] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 5541f689495641d7 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 1411.305756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9776b144 RDI: ffffffff977e1b0e
[ 1411.305758] RBP: ffff9cf5c02b2f40 R08: ffff9cf5ca7606c0 R09: ffffcbd43ee02c04
[ 1411.306978] bpf_prog_32007c34f7726d29_bpf_prog1+0xaf/0xd9c
[ 1411.307861] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000044 R12: ffff9cf5c2ef60e0
[ 1411.307865] R13: 0000000000000005 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9cf5c2ef6108
[ 1411.309074] bpf_trace_run2+0x8f/0x1a0
[ 1411.309891] FS: 00007ff485141700(0000) GS:ffff9cf5fae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1411.309896] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1411.311221] syscall_trace_enter.isra.20+0x161/0x1f0
[ 1411.311600] CR2: 00007ff48514d90e CR3: 0000000107114001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
[ 1411.312291] do_syscall_64+0x15/0x80
[ 1411.312941] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 1411.313803] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 1411.314223] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 1411.315082] RIP: 0033:0x7f00ad80a0e0
[ 1411.315626] Call Trace:
[ 1411.315632] stack_map_get_build_id_offset+0x17c/0x260
To reproduce, first build `test_progs` binary:
make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j60
and then run the binary at tools/testing/selftests/bpf directory:
./test_progs -t get_stack_raw_tp
The warning is due to commit 5b78ed24e8ec("mm/pagemap: add mmap_assert_locked() annotations to find_vma*()")
which added mmap_assert_locked() in find_vma() function. The mmap_assert_locked() function
asserts that mm->mmap_lock needs to be held. But this is not the case for
bpf_get_stack() or bpf_get_stackid() helper (kernel/bpf/stackmap.c), which
uses mmap_read_trylock_non_owner() instead. Since mm->mmap_lock is not held
in bpf_get_stack[id]() use case, the above warning is emitted during test run.
This patch added function find_vma_no_check() which does not have mmap_assert_locked() call and
bpf_get_stack[id]() helpers call find_vma_no_check() instead. This resolved the above warning.
I didn't use __find_vma() name because it has been used in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:
static struct i915_vma_coredump *
__find_vma(struct i915_vma_coredump *vma, const char *name) { ... }
Cc: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 5b78ed24e8ec("mm/pagemap: add mmap_assert_locked() annotations to find_vma*()")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
Luigi / Liam / Andrew, if the below looks reasonable to you, any objections to route the
fix with your ACKs via bpf tree to Linus (or strong preference via -mm fixes)?
Thanks,
Daniel
---
include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 2 +-
mm/mmap.c | 9 +++++++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 50e2c2914ac2..ba7a11d900f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2669,6 +2669,8 @@ extern int expand_upwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address);
#endif
/* Look up the first VMA which satisfies addr < vm_end, NULL if none. */
+extern struct vm_area_struct * find_vma_no_check(struct mm_struct * mm,
+ unsigned long addr);
extern struct vm_area_struct * find_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, unsigned long addr);
extern struct vm_area_struct * find_vma_prev(struct mm_struct * mm, unsigned long addr,
struct vm_area_struct **pprev);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index e8eefdf8cf3e..838a2c141497 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
}
for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
- vma = find_vma(current->mm, ips[i]);
+ vma = find_vma_no_check(current->mm, ips[i]);
if (!vma || build_id_parse(vma, id_offs[i].build_id, NULL)) {
/* per entry fall back to ips */
id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 88dcc5c25225..8d5e340114f8 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2270,12 +2270,11 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_unmapped_area);
/* Look up the first VMA which satisfies addr < vm_end, NULL if none. */
-struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+struct vm_area_struct *find_vma_no_check(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
struct rb_node *rb_node;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- mmap_assert_locked(mm);
/* Check the cache first. */
vma = vmacache_find(mm, addr);
if (likely(vma))
@@ -2302,6 +2301,12 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
return vma;
}
+struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ mmap_assert_locked(mm);
+ return find_vma_no_check(mm, addr);
+}
+
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_vma);
/*
