> On Sep 2, 2021, at 1:56 PM, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Song Liu wrote:
>> Introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot(), which allows tracing pogram to get
>> branch trace from hardware (e.g. Intel LBR). To use the feature, the
>> user need to create perf_event with proper branch_record filtering
>> on each cpu, and then calls bpf_get_branch_snapshot in the bpf function.
>> On Intel CPUs, VLBR event (raw event 0x1b00) can be use for this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> +BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_branch_snapshot, void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
>> +{
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +#else
>> + static const u32 br_entry_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
>> + u32 entry_cnt = size / br_entry_size;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(flags))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!buf || (size % br_entry_size != 0))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> LGTM, but why fail if buffer is slightly larger than expected? I guess its a slightly
> buggy program that would do this, but not actually harmful right?
This check was added because bpf_read_branch_records() has a similar check.
I guess it is OK either way.
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the review!
