On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 6:03 PM Yucong Sun <fallentree@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch adds '-a' and '-d' arguments, supporting exact string match, as well
> as using '*' wildcard in test/subtests selection. The old '-t' '-b' arguments
> still supports partial string match, but they can't be used together yet.
typo: support
>
> Caveat: As same as the current substring matching mechanism, test and subtest
"Same as"
> selector applies independently, 'a*/b*' will execute all tests matches "a*",
s/matches/matching/ same below
> and with subtest name matches "b*", but tests matches "a*" but has no subtests
> will also be executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <fallentree@xxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index 90539b15b744..f5dbaa29d370 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,28 @@
> #include <execinfo.h> /* backtrace */
> #include <linux/membarrier.h>
>
> +/* Adapted from perf/util/string.c */
> +static bool glob_match(const char *str, const char *pat)
> +{
> + while (*str && *pat && *pat != '*') {
> + if (*str != *pat)
> + return false;
> + str++;
> + pat++;
> + }
> + /* Check wild card */
> + if (*pat == '*') {
> + while (*pat == '*')
> + pat++;
> + if (!*pat) /* Tail wild card matches all */
> + return true;
> + while (*str)
> + if (glob_match(str++, pat))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return !*str && !*pat;
> +}
> +
> #define EXIT_NO_TEST 2
> #define EXIT_ERR_SETUP_INFRA 3
>
> @@ -55,12 +77,12 @@ static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < sel->blacklist.cnt; i++) {
> - if (strstr(name, sel->blacklist.strs[i]))
> + if (glob_match(name, sel->blacklist.strs[i]))
> return false;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < sel->whitelist.cnt; i++) {
> - if (strstr(name, sel->whitelist.strs[i]))
> + if (glob_match(name, sel->whitelist.strs[i]))
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -450,6 +472,8 @@ enum ARG_KEYS {
> ARG_VERBOSE = 'v',
> ARG_GET_TEST_CNT = 'c',
> ARG_LIST_TEST_NAMES = 'l',
> + ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_ALLOWLIST = 'a',
> + ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_DENYLIST = 'd',
> };
>
> static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
> @@ -467,6 +491,10 @@ static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
> "Get number of selected top-level tests " },
> { "list", ARG_LIST_TEST_NAMES, NULL, 0,
> "List test names that would run (without running them) " },
> + { "allow", ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_ALLOWLIST, "NAMES", 0,
> + "Run tests with name matching the pattern (support *)." },
> + { "deny", ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_DENYLIST, "NAMES", 0,
> + "Don't run tests with name matching the pattern (support *)." },
> {},
> };
>
> @@ -491,7 +519,7 @@ static void free_str_set(const struct str_set *set)
> free(set->strs);
> }
>
> -static int parse_str_list(const char *s, struct str_set *set)
> +static int parse_str_list(const char *s, struct str_set *set, bool is_glob_pattern)
> {
> char *input, *state = NULL, *next, **tmp, **strs = NULL;
> int cnt = 0;
> @@ -508,8 +536,14 @@ static int parse_str_list(const char *s, struct str_set *set)
> if (!tmp)
> goto err;
> strs = tmp;
> + if (is_glob_pattern)
> + strs[cnt] = strdup(next);
coding style: if one branch of if/else uses {}, the other has to use it as well
> + else {
> + char* pat = malloc(strlen(next) + 2 + 1);
coding style: empty line after variable declaration (but I'd just use
strs[cnt] twice without extra var)
also `char *pat`, please use checkpatch.pl to double check your
changes until kernel code style becomes second nature (and even then
it's probably useful to run it from time to time). We do have few
errors reported in test_progs.c, but the script would reported 2 out
of 3 of these problems. At some point we should see if it makes sense
to run checkpatch.pl as one of BPF CI steps.
> + sprintf(pat, "*%s*", next);
> + strs[cnt] = pat;
> + }
>
> - strs[cnt] = strdup(next);
> if (!strs[cnt])
> goto err;
>
> @@ -553,29 +587,43 @@ static error_t parse_arg(int key, char *arg, struct argp_state *state)
> }
> break;
> }
> + case ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_ALLOWLIST:
> case ARG_TEST_NAME: {
> + if (env->test_selector.whitelist.cnt || env->subtest_selector.whitelist.cnt) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "-a and -t are mutually exclusive, you can only specify one.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Why are they still exclusive? They are now just alternative ways to
specify the same set of filters, one as substring match, another as
explicit globs. Just like you can use '-t a,b', you can also have '-t
a -a "*b*"', right? They can totally co-exist and it might be useful
to use both sometimes.
> char *subtest_str = strchr(arg, '/');
>
> if (subtest_str) {
> *subtest_str = '\0';
> if (parse_str_list(subtest_str + 1,
> - &env->subtest_selector.whitelist))
> + &env->subtest_selector.whitelist,
> + key == ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_ALLOWLIST))
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> - if (parse_str_list(arg, &env->test_selector.whitelist))
> + if (parse_str_list(arg, &env->test_selector.whitelist,
> + key == ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_ALLOWLIST))
> return -ENOMEM;
> break;
> }
> + case ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_DENYLIST:
> case ARG_TEST_NAME_BLACKLIST: {
> + if (env->test_selector.blacklist.cnt || env->subtest_selector.blacklist.cnt) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "-d and -b are mutually exclusive, you can only specify one.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
same, they can organically co-exist
> char *subtest_str = strchr(arg, '/');
>
> if (subtest_str) {
> *subtest_str = '\0';
> if (parse_str_list(subtest_str + 1,
> - &env->subtest_selector.blacklist))
> + &env->subtest_selector.blacklist,
> + key == ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_DENYLIST))
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> - if (parse_str_list(arg, &env->test_selector.blacklist))
> + if (parse_str_list(arg, &env->test_selector.blacklist,
> + key == ARG_TEST_NAME_GLOB_DENYLIST))
> return -ENOMEM;
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> index c8c2bf878f67..c475d65dce4f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum verbosity {
> struct str_set {
> const char **strs;
> int cnt;
> + bool is_glob_pattern;
leftovers? doesn't seem to be used
> };
>
> struct test_selector {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
