Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] libbpf: support weak typed ksyms.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 2:47 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:22 AM Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Currently weak typeless ksyms have default value zero, when they don't
> > exist in the kernel. However, weak typed ksyms are rejected by libbpf
> > if they can not be resolved. This means that if a bpf object contains
> > the declaration of a nonexistent weak typed ksym, it will be rejected
> > even if there is no program that references the symbol.
> >
> > Nonexistent weak typed ksyms can also default to zero just like
> > typeless ones. This allows programs that access weak typed ksyms to be
> > accepted by verifier, if the accesses are guarded. For example,
> >
> > extern const int bpf_link_fops3 __ksym __weak;
> >
> > /* then in BPF program */
> >
> > if (&bpf_link_fops3) {
> >    /* use bpf_link_fops3 */
> > }
> >
> > If actual use of nonexistent typed ksym is not guarded properly,
> > verifier would see that register is not PTR_TO_BTF_ID and wouldn't
> > allow to use it for direct memory reads or passing it to BPF helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Selftests are failing ([0]). Did they work locally?..
>
>   test_weak_syms:PASS:test_ksyms_weak__open_and_load 0 nsec
>   test_weak_syms:FAIL:existing typed ksym unexpected existing typed
> ksym: actual -1 != expected 0
>   test_weak_syms:FAIL:existing typeless ksym unexpected existing
> typeless ksym: actual -1 == expected -1
>   test_weak_syms:FAIL:nonexistent typeless ksym unexpected nonexistent
> typeless ksym: actual -1 != expected 0
>   test_weak_syms:FAIL:nonexistent typed ksym unexpected nonexistent
> typed ksym: actual -1 != expected 0
>   #59/3 weak_ksyms:FAIL
>   #59 ksyms_btf:FAIL
>

Doh, in the test I accidentally removed the line of attachment in the
last minute of sending out... :) Let me resend quickly.


>
>   [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/1611/checks?check_run_id=3305288074
>
> > Changes since v1:
> >  - Weak typed symbols default to zero, as suggested by Andrii.
> >  - Use ASSERT_XXX() for tets.
> >
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 17 ++++--
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_btf.c      | 25 ++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms_weak.c     | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms_weak.c
> >
>
> [...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux