Before, the eBPF JITs allowed up to MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 tail calls. Now, precisely MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT is allowed, which is in line with the behaviour of the interpreter. Verified with the test_bpf test suite on qemu-system-ppc and qemu-system-ppc64, respectively. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index beb12cbc8c29..6d720728df09 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -221,13 +221,13 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); /* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R0, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); /* tail_call_cnt++; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDIC(_R0, _R0, 1)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out); + PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(_R3, b2p_index, 2, 0, 29)); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index b87a63dba9c8..2f4d24ed90a4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -227,12 +227,12 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); /* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out); + PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); /* * tail_call_cnt++; -- 2.25.1
