Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/8] libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() and btf__load() APIs, support split BTF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:20 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As part of the effort to move towards a v1.0 for libbpf [0], this set
> improves some confusing function names related to BTF loading from and to
> the kernel:
>
> - btf__load() becomes btf__load_into_kernel().
> - btf__get_from_id becomes btf__load_from_kernel_by_id().
> - A new version btf__load_from_kernel_by_id_split() extends the former to
>   add support for split BTF.
>
> The old functions are marked for deprecation for the next minor version
> (0.6) of libbpf.
>
> The last patch is a trivial change to bpftool to add support for dumping
> split BTF objects by referencing them by their id (and not only by their
> BTF path).
>
> [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/wiki/Libbpf:-the-road-to-v1.0#btfh-apis
>
> v3:
> - Use libbpf_err_ptr() in btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(), ERR_PTR() in
>   bpftool's get_map_kv_btf().
> - Move the definition of btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() closer to the
>   btf__parse() group in btf.h (move the legacy function with it).
> - Fix a bug on the return value in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id(), as a new
>   patch.
> - Move the btf__free() fixes to their own patch.
> - Add "Fixes:" tags to relevant patches.
> - Re-introduce deprecation (removed in v2) for the legacy functions, as a
>   new macro LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, message).
>
> v2:
> - Remove deprecation marking of legacy functions (patch 4/6 from v1).
> - Make btf__load_from_kernel_by_id{,_split}() return the btf struct, adjust
>   surrounding code and call btf__free() when missing.
> - Add new functions to v0.5.0 API (and not v0.6.0).
>
> Quentin Monnet (8):
>   libbpf: return non-null error on failures in libbpf_find_prog_btf_id()
>   libbpf: rename btf__load() as btf__load_into_kernel()
>   libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() as btf__load_from_kernel_by_id()
>   tools: free BTF objects at various locations
>   tools: replace btf__get_from_id() with btf__load_from_kernel_by_id()
>   libbpf: prepare deprecation of btf__get_from_id(), btf__load()
>   libbpf: add split BTF support for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id()
>   tools: bpftool: support dumping split BTF by id
>
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c                      |  8 ++---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c               |  6 ++--
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c                      | 14 ++++-----
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                     | 29 +++++++++++------
>  tools/lib/bpf/Makefile                       |  3 ++
>  tools/lib/bpf/btf.c                          | 33 ++++++++++++++------
>  tools/lib/bpf/btf.h                          |  7 ++++-
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                       | 11 ++++---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                     |  3 ++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h                | 19 +++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c                  | 11 ++++---
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c                | 12 +++++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c |  4 ++-
>  13 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>

I dropped patch #7 with deprecations and LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE and
applied to bpf-next.

Current LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE approach doesn't work (and you should
have caught this when you built selftests/bpf, what happened there?).
bpftool build generates warnings like this:

In file included from /data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h:20,
                 from xlated_dumper.c:10:
/data/users/andriin/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h:22:23:
warning: "LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION" is not defined, evaluates to 0
[-Wundef]
  __LIBBPF_GET_VERSION(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION, LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION)
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


And it makes total sense. LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE() assumes
LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION is defined at compilation
time of the *application that is using libbpf*, not just libbpf's
compilation time. And that's clearly a bogus assumption which we can't
and shouldn't make. The right approach will be to define
LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION/LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION in some sort of
auto-generated header, included from libbpf_common.h and installed as
part of libbpf package.

Anyways, I've removed all the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE stuff and
applied all the rest, as it looks good and is a useful addition. We
should work some more on deprecation helpers, though.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux