On 7/28/21 10:04 AM, Johan Almbladh wrote:
This patch adds BPF_MUL tests for 64x32 and 64x64 multiply. Mainly
testing 32-bit JITs that implement ALU64 operations with two 32-bit
CPU registers per operand.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index b930fa35b9ef..eb61088a674f 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -3051,6 +3051,31 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ },
{ { 0, 2147483647 } },
},
+ {
+ "ALU64_MUL_X: 64x64 multiply, low word",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0x0fedcba987654321LL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x123456789abcdef0LL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MUL, R0, R1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0xe5618cf0 } }
Same here. Maybe capture the true 64-bit R0 value?
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_MUL_X: 64x64 multiply, high word",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0x0fedcba987654321LL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x123456789abcdef0LL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MUL, R0, R1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, R0, 32),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0x2236d88f } }
+ },
/* BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K */
{
"ALU_MUL_K: 2 * 3 = 6",
@@ -3161,6 +3186,29 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ },
{ { 0, 0x1 } },
},
+ {
+ "ALU64_MUL_K: 64x32 multiply, low word",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0x0123456789abcdefLL),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, R0, 0x12345678),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0xe242d208 } }
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_MUL_K: 64x32 multiply, high word",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0x0123456789abcdefLL),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, R0, 0x12345678),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, R0, 32),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0xc28f5c28 } }
+ },
/* BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X */
{
"ALU_DIV_X: 6 / 2 = 3",
