Re: [bpf-next v2 1/2] samples: bpf: Fix tracex7 error raised on the missing argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 04:10:55 +0000 you wrote:
> The current behavior of 'tracex7' doesn't consist with other bpf samples
> tracex{1..6}. Other samples do not require any argument to run with, but
> tracex7 should be run with btrfs device argument. (it should be executed
> with test_override_return.sh)
> 
> Currently, tracex7 doesn't have any description about how to run this
> program and raises an unexpected error. And this result might be
> confusing since users might not have a hunch about how to run this
> program.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] samples: bpf: Fix tracex7 error raised on the missing argument
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7d07006f0592
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] samples: bpf: Add the omitted xdp samples to .gitignore
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/05e9b4f60d31

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux