Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] tools/resolve_btfids: emit warnings and patch zero id for missing symbols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2021/7/27 4:16 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:18 AM Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Kernel functions referenced by .BTF_ids may changed from global to static
>> and get inlined and thus disappears from BTF. This causes kernel build
>> failure when resolve_btfids do id patch for symbols in .BTF_ids in vmlinux.
>> Update resolve_btfids to emit warning messages and patch zero id for missing
>> symbols instead of aborting kernel build process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c | 13 +++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
>> index 3ad9301b0f00..3ea19e33250d 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int compressed_section_fix(Elf *elf, Elf_Scn *scn, GElf_Shdr *sh)
>>         sh->sh_addralign = expected;
>>
>>         if (gelf_update_shdr(scn, sh) == 0) {
>> -               printf("FAILED cannot update section header: %s\n",
>> +               pr_err("FAILED cannot update section header: %s\n",
>>                         elf_errmsg(-1));
>>                 return -1;
>>         }
>> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static int elf_collect(struct object *obj)
>>
>>         elf = elf_begin(fd, ELF_C_RDWR_MMAP, NULL);
>>         if (!elf) {
>> +               close(fd);
>>                 pr_err("FAILED cannot create ELF descriptor: %s\n",
>>                         elf_errmsg(-1));
>>                 return -1;
>> @@ -484,7 +485,7 @@ static int symbols_resolve(struct object *obj)
>>         err = libbpf_get_error(btf);
>>         if (err) {
>>                 pr_err("FAILED: load BTF from %s: %s\n",
>> -                       obj->path, strerror(-err));
>> +                       obj->btf ?: obj->path, strerror(-err));
>>                 return -1;
>>         }
>>
>> @@ -555,8 +556,7 @@ static int id_patch(struct object *obj, struct btf_id *id)
>>         int i;
>>
>>         if (!id->id) {
>> -               pr_err("FAILED unresolved symbol %s\n", id->name);
>> -               return -EINVAL;
>> +               pr_err("WARN: unresolved symbol %s\n", id->name);
> 
> we should probably give a bit more information for people to get back
> to us for this. For starters, maybe prefix the message with
> "resolve_btfids:" so that people at least can grep something relevant?
> 

OK, will do.

>>         }
>>
>>         for (i = 0; i < id->addr_cnt; i++) {
>> @@ -734,8 +734,9 @@ int main(int argc, const char **argv)
>>
>>         err = 0;
>>  out:
>> -       if (obj.efile.elf)
>> +       if (obj.efile.elf) {
>>                 elf_end(obj.efile.elf);
>> -       close(obj.efile.fd);
>> +               close(obj.efile.fd);
>> +       }
>>         return err;
>>  }
>> --
>> 2.25.1



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux