On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 3:41 AM Johan Almbladh
<johan.almbladh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This test now operates on DW as stated instead of W, which was
> already covered by another test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Don't know why patchbot didn't send notification, but this got applied
last Friday to bpf-next.
> lib/test_bpf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index baff847a02da..f6d5d30d01bf 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -4286,8 +4286,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
> .u.insns_int = {
> BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0),
> BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0xffffffffffffffffLL),
> - BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, R10, R1, -40),
> - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R0, R10, -40),
> + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R1, -40),
> + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R0, R10, -40),
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> },
> INTERNAL,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
