Re: Prog section rejected: Argument list too long (7)!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 7:17 PM Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi BPF experts,
>
> I have a cilium PR https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/16916 that
> failed to pass verifier in kernel 4.19, the error is like:
>
> level=warning msg="Prog section '2/7' rejected: Argument list too long
> (7)!" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg=" - Type:         3" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg=" - Attach Type:  0" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg=" - Instructions: 4578 (482 over limit)"
> subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg=" - License:      GPL" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg="Verifier analysis:" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg="Error filling program arrays!" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg="Unable to load program" subsys=datapath-loader
>
> then I tried to run the PR locally in my dev machine with custom upstream
> kernel version, I narrowed the issue down to between upstream kernel
> version 5.7 and 5.8, in 5.7, it failed with:

I further narrow it down to between 5.7 and 5.8-rc1 release, but still
no clue which commits in 5.8-rc1 resolved the issue

>
> level=warning msg="processed 50 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn
> 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg="Log buffer too small to dump verifier log 16777215
> bytes (9 tries)!" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg="Error filling program arrays!" subsys=datapath-loader
> level=warning msg="Unable to load program" subsys=datapath-loader
>
> 5.8 works fine.
>
> What difference between 5.7 and 5.8 to cause this verifier problem, I
> tried to git log v5.7..v5.8 kernel/bpf/verifier, I could not see commits
> that would make the difference with my limited BPF knowledge. Any clue
> would be appreciated!
>
> Thanks
>
> Vincent
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux